In a recent talk, Carroll Bogert, the deputy director of
Humans Rights Watch came to Muhlenberg College and discussed the United States
role in civil rights in the 21st century. While initially Bogert
discussed how Human Rights Watch functions through investigation and exposure
of a story of human rights violations and finally how change can ultimately be
used to better the situation. Though, the main point that she made in her talk
was that in order for the United States to lead the world on insuring human
rights internationally, they need to be able to insure that the human rights
violations, the United States itself commits are solved. In her view, the
United States have no right to tell another nation how they should treat their
citizens, if some people in this nation’s custody are not give their
internationally guaranteed basic human rights. Through the use of several
examples occurring in America as we speak, Bogert explains America’s human
rights failures, most notably, the treatment of terrorists at Guantanamo Bay
and illegal immigrants. In my opinion
Carroll Bogert’s argument concerning the United States’ human rights issues had
one major implication and that was to draw attention to the problems involving
human welfare that do exist in America, and these violations need to be dealt
with before America can itself be labeled the world’s foremost human rights
leader.
The
United States has long been seen as the world’s policeman, as the Earth’s
foremost power, America acted as a mediator and a punisher when governments do not
treat their people in a humane manner, but as groups like Human Rights Watch
–and Carroll Bogert through this talk—demonstrate that America is just as
guilty of these violations as other nations. The importance of discussing these
violations as Bogert discussed is because it begs the question: how can America
be the leader of human rights internationally, when there are blatant violations
of human rights treaties happening right here in the United States? Bogert
answered this question simply: it cannot. The importance of this question is
because it draws people to the problems that exist in America, in which Bogert
covered two major injustices in our immigration system and the use of torture
on suspected terrorist prisoners. The mainstream media has done dozens of
stories over the past year on the mistreatment of undocumented immigrants, but
they usually fail to go deeper than the fact that they are here and they are a
problem. Carroll Bogert discussed how Human Rights Watch went more in depth to
discover that undocumented people had a much higher risk of having crimes
committed against them (such as robbery or rape), because they are scared to
report it to authorities for fear of deportation. This is a violation of a
human’s right to equality, because why should you and I be able to freely
report a robbery or a rape to the police without fear of repercussions, and an
undocumented immigrant not be able to do so on the basis of fear. Bogert
mentioned that law changes in the United States could take place in order to insure
that any person no matter their status as an American citizen can report a
crime without having to worry about possible negative effects. Another such
instance of human rights violations are the torture and justice methods used on
prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. First as Bogert mentioned, criminals at Gitmo who
have been deemed to be terroristic threats are not given regular trials by
jury, but instead a military tribunal, which is conducted by a military
official and not an actual judge. However, the main reason for military
tribunals is so evidence that was gained through torture can be admitted in
court. America is one of the only developed nations in the world to employ
torture as a way of getting information and simple policy changes to prevent this
from occurring could be put into place, but yet that fails to occur. In both
these instances the United States again violated human rights legislation
because a human right is equality before the law, which in this case is clearly
violated.
Bogert
through analyzing these instances of human rights violations proved that
America is in need of drastic changes in order to insure the safety of human
rights for the people in this country. A common misnomer that is stated when it
comes to these issues are that the people affected by these human rights
violations are illegal aliens and suspected terrorists, people who did things
to break the law, but that does not mean as Bogert states towards the end of
her talk, that human rights do not differ country to country, and person to
person, they are international and should be treated equally no matter where
they be found. Bogert left her audience with one question: what is the United
States afraid of (when it comes to insuring equal human rights)? In my opinion,
before America can take charge in providing international aid to human rights
violations taking place at every corner of the Earth, it must first be able to
lead itself in insuring that the way America conducts its business with the
people in its territory is a model system of human rights for the rest of the
world to follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment